|
|
Off to Oz...
TEACHING NOTES & EVALUATION
Refer to this evaluation form when evaluating your students'
work...
| |
below
standard
1
|
standard
2
|
above
standard
3
|
outstanding
4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Postcard |
short, insufficient coverage of all
points, little or no linking; grammatical and lexical errors make
it difficult to decode message; style and/or layout inappropriate |
short but main points all covered and
logically ordered; grammatical and lexical mistakes do not impede
overall intelligibility; style may be awkward but is not intrusive |
well-researched; good range of points
included, and cohesively linked; good standard of accuracy and stylistic
appropriacy; wide range of vocabulary |
information highly credible showing
evidence of detailed research; imaginative; creative use of language
to a high standard of accuracy and complexity; style appropriate
and layout correct |
| |
| Interview |
interview confused and/or short and/or
difficult to follow, poorly researched and/or minimally illustrated,
and/or under-rehearsed, work not well distributed between group
members; little apparent liaison or collaboration |
interview organised into stages, sufficiently
detailed to give a general idea; evidence of rehearsal and sufficient
group collaboration, even if workload not evenly distributed |
well organised interview, with clear
and detailed stages, showing evidence of thorough research and rehearsal;
effectively illustrated or explained; work well co-ordinated and
evenly distributed |
interview painstakingly researched
and carried out in an engaging, even entertaining, way; technically
impressive, well resourced; even distribution of work, each contribution
harmoniously linked to make a coherent whole |
| |
| Brochure |
Insufficient coverage of all points,
with little or no reference to information discovered or discussed
in previous stages; advice not relevant to context; grammatical
and lexical errors make it difficult to decode message; work not
well distributed between group members; little apparent liaison
or collaboration |
main points all covered and logically
organised; advice generally relevant to context; grammatical and
lexical mistakes do not impede overall intelligibility; sufficient
group collaboration, even if workload not evenly distributed |
well-researched; good range of points
included, and well organised; good standard of accuracy and advice
relevant to context; wide range of vocabulary; work well co-ordinated
and evenly distributed |
information highly credible showing
evidence of detailed research; relevance to context; imaginative;
creative use of language to a high standard of accuracy and complexity;
style appropriate and layout correct; work well co-ordinated and
evenly distributed |
| |
| Self-evaluation |
short,
clumsily written and/or lacking in self-awareness; inaccurate to
the point of unintelligibility |
sufficiently
detailed, balanced appraisal, covering all main points; grammatical
and lexical mistakes do not impede overall intelligibility |
perceptive
self-appraisal; fair and balanced account of involvement, accurately
and coherently written; all points covered and some in considerable
depth |
extremely
insightful detailed and well-rounded account; balanced and informed;
written in engaging, accurate and stylistically appropriate style |
| |
TOTAL MARKS AWARDED.........
|
CONCLUSION
This WebQuest has introduced learners to an English-speaking country,
familiarising them with its geography, climate, touristic features and
lifestyle, by means of English-language resources on the WWW.
They have had to collaborate to carry out an interview, to write and
compile an informative brochure, as well as work individually on postcard
writing skills in English, requiring original synthesis and organization
of data. They have also engaged self-appraisal skills.
|