As the assignment consists of a written piece of work and no oral presentation is due to present there will be two rubrics, one to account for the final written product and the collaborative rubric to account for the individual and cooperative work of each member within his/her team.
Contributes |
Not Enough 1 |
Ok 2 |
Good 3 |
Excellent 4 |
Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reseach,gather and share information. |
1.
You've made little effort to search for and collect materials related to the topic. |
2. You've made certain effort to search, gather and share material related to the topic but it could be improved. |
3. You've made condiserable effort to collect some relevant basic information mostly related to the topic |
4. You've made a great effort and collects a big deal of information related to the topic to share. |
|
Elaboration and Organization of the content. |
1.
Contents have been reproduced without any farther elaboration. The product's messy, confused or incomplete. |
2.
Contents have been barely elaborated, they're organised in sections but lack coherence and cohesion. |
3.
Contents have been considerably elaborated according to the aims. There's a good organization of the contents: coherence and cohesion |
4. Contents have been perfectly elaborated according to our goals. They show a thorough planification, coherence and cohesion. |
|
Language: use of the comparative and superlative structures. Sentence and lexical correctness. |
1.
There are plenty of grammar and spelling mistakes.The sentences aren't clear. |
2.
The sentences generally follow the rules but there are too many mistakes related to the sintax, lexis and spelling. |
3. There's a good use of the grammar structures. Few lexis and spelling mistakes. The sentences are clear. |
4.
There's grammar spelling and lexis correctness.The sentences are very clear. The use of the English is fluent and faultless. |
|
Formal presentation. Page layout and article composition: distribution of the texts and pictures. Use the word processor. |
1. The project is badly edited. It is not illustrated.It's the result of carelessness. |
2.
The final result is average. You haven't made your best according to what was expected and considering the tools provided. |
3. The final result is fine. You've produced a balanced article text-images resulting in an attractive layout. |
4.
The final result is excellent. The quality of the article is almost professional. Congratulations! |